For an editorial, the evaluation should focus more on scholarly perspective, balance of arguments, relevance, originality of insights, and contribution to the field rather than methodology or statistical analysis. This editorial addresses a highly relevant and contemporary topic and provides a thoughtful, balanced, and well-articulated perspective on the subject. The author has successfully synthesized current evidence and expert opinion into a coherent narrative that is both informative and engaging for the readership. The article demonstrates a high degree of objectivity and scientific credibility. The arguments are logically developed, appropriately referenced, and supported by the available literature. The author presents the topic in a balanced manner, acknowledging existing challenges and areas of uncertainty while highlighting important advances and future opportunities within the field. The revised version reflects careful consideration of reviewer and editorial feedback. The clarity of presentation, organization of content, and overall readability have been improved. The key messages are clearly conveyed, and the discussion effectively places the topic within the broader context of current clinical practice and ongoing scientific developments. One of the major strengths of this editorial is its ability to stimulate critical thinking and encourage further discussion among clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The perspectives offered are timely, relevant, and likely to attract considerable interest from readers. The manuscript successfully highlights important unmet needs and identifies potential directions for future research and development. Although editorials are inherently opinion-based and not intended to provide exhaustive systematic analyses, the author has maintained an appropriate balance between expert interpretation and evidence-based discussion. Any remaining limitations are minor and do not detract from the overall value of the article. Overall, this is a well-written, insightful, and scientifically credible editorial that makes a meaningful contribution to the literature. It provides valuable perspectives on an important issue, is likely to enhance reader engagement, and may help stimulate future research and academic discourse within the discipline. I commend the author for this excellent contribution and support its publication.